-
Running consumes less energy than skipping, since it is a movement that pushes forward and not also upward.
-
Running is also safer and more sustainable, and loads fewer joints and muscles.
-
The fact that it then provides greater speed and control make running the ideal option for long distances.
T
his article was inspired by a video on Instagram that sparked two thoughts: “Are they keeping something from us?” and “What if?” The video claims—or at least makes you feel—that skipping is more efficient than running. It’s convincing enough that you might think, “Why don’t we move like that then?” Here’s my take, though let’s be real—it would be fun if it were that simple!
Why did we stop skipping?
Watching that video takes you back to a time when skipping was natural. All kids do it; it’s playful, spontaneous, and carefree. So, if it’s such a natural movement, why don’t we keep doing it as adults? Maybe it’s like other things we grow out of, like playing, drawing, or eating with our hands (okay, maybe we’re better off with a few of these habits retired). But in terms of efficiency, practicality, and safety, running clearly has the edge over skipping.
1. Energy efficiency
When we run, our bodies are designed to limit vertical motion, creating a streamlined gait that conserves energy. A running stride is focused on forward motion, reducing wasted energy. Skipping, however, constantly lifts the body upward, burning through energy fast and making it hard to keep a steady pace over long distances. Imagine trying to skip a marathon—you’d be exhausted well before the finish line!
2. Biomechanics
Running alternates between pushing off and a short “flight,” distributing impact evenly across the knees, hips, and ankles. This balanced pattern minimizes stress on any single joint. In contrast, skipping sends greater impact through the knees and ankles with each landing, increasing the risk of overuse injuries and making it a less efficient choice for distance.
3. Precision and stability
Running allows you to reach high speeds while maintaining control. The biomechanics of running support a smooth, stable gait with quick strides, whereas skipping can feel unsteady, especially at higher speeds. In short, skipping is a fun, short-distance activity, but it doesn’t offer the precision and control that running does.
4. The physics of running
Running utilizes the “stretch and shorten cycle” of muscles—especially in the Achilles tendon and calves—which stores and releases elastic energy with each step. This boosts efficiency and reduces fatigue. Skipping doesn’t use this system as effectively; instead, it requires more muscle strength for each jump, increasing energy demands and limiting recovery.
5. Practicality and safety
Human evolution has shaped us for running, making it practical and safe on almost any terrain, from paved roads to dirt trails. Skipping, on the other hand, is less stable on uneven surfaces and only efficient over short distances. While skipping is undeniably fun, it’s not as versatile or secure as running when it comes to varied terrains.
Skipping to a conclusion
In summary, running, unlike skipping, is a movement perfectly suited to the endurance and speed demands we’ve developed as humans. Skipping can be a playful, low-intensity exercise—great for warm-ups or light recovery. But for efficiency, control, and steady pacing, running is unparalleled.
Of course, if you’re in the mood to celebrate with a skip or two, go for it! And if anyone questions your joy, well, they’re just missing out on the fun.